Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Validation of Individual Non-Linear Predictive Pharmacokinetic Parameters in a Rabbit Phenytoin Model

Kosta J Popović1 , Mihalj Posa1, Dusica J Popović2, Dusan Lalosević3, Jovan K Popović2

1Department of Pharmacy; 2Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine; 3Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Republic of Serbia.

For correspondence:-  Kosta Popović   Email: jovapop@neobee.net

Received: 24 February 2014        Accepted: 28 June 2014        Published: 18 August 2014

Citation: Popović KJ, Posa M, Popović DJ, Lalosević D, Popović JK. Validation of Individual Non-Linear Predictive Pharmacokinetic Parameters in a Rabbit Phenytoin Model. Trop J Pharm Res 2014; 13(8):1295-1302 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v13i8.14

© 2014 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the predictive performance of phenytoin multiple dosing non-linear pharmacokinetic model in rabbits for possible application in therapy individualization in humans.
Methods: Phenytoin was intravenously administered to 10 rabbits (2 – 3 kg). Plasma concentrations were measured by high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). Rabbits received 3 single phenytoin doses (11, 22 and 44 mg/kg) and plasma concentrations were fitted according to linear two-compartmental model. In all the rabbits, based on 3 different multiple doses (D1, D2, D3, range  9 – 15 mg/kg), 3 steady state plasma concentrations (Css1, Css2, Css3, range 20 - 56mg/l) were achieved. For multiple dosage, the non-linear parameters, Km and Vm, were calculated according to the equations: Km = (D1-D2)/[(D2/Css2)-(D1/Css1)] and Vm = D2+KmD2/Css2, and individually used to calculate Css3 = D3Km/(Vm-D3). Predicted and measured Css3 values were compared.
Results: The values for pharmacokinetic parameters after single doses were dose-dependent. The pronounced inter-individual variations in Km (extreme values 18 – 91 mg/l differed 5.5 times) and Vm (11 – 28 mg/kg/h) values were recorded. Significant correlation of predicted Css3 with the measured value for the same dose (D3) was found (r = 0.854, N = 10, p < 0.01). There was no statistical difference between predicted and measured concentrations (t-dependent test = 1.074, p < 0.05).
Conclusion:  Non-linear parameters, Km and Vm, obtained from only two steady-state concentration measurements can be successfully used to compute and achieve a particular steady-state plasma concentration and optimal dosage regimen.  

Keywords: Phenytoin, Rabbit, Pharmacokinetic model, Multiple dosing, Non-linear, Individualization

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates